It’s common knowledge that there is a “consensus” among “experts” that human caused global warming is a fact. But is this really true? If it was ever true, the tide may be turning. James Lovelock, famous as the originator of the Gaia Hypothesis, now admits in a new book:

I was alarmist about global warming

The climate certainly does appear to be changing, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that this is caused by humans. When you hear people say that it’s been proven that humans are the cause of global warming, think about it? How could anyone know this, unless they have some human-free parallel earth as a control?

It is extremely politically incorrect to question man made global warming. The implication is that if you take an opposing position, you don’t care about the environment and are an apologist for big business. This doesn’t have to be the case. We can agree that pollution is bad, and that there are some extremely dangerous effects produced by humans in recent years -e.g. radiation, GMOs, pesticides, electromagnetic fields and so forth. Our air, land and oceans are certainly polluted, and this is a threat to both animals and humans. But that doesn’t necessarily mean large scale climate change.

To complicate matters even more, there is the fact of governments experimenting with weather control as a weapon. So we have to be open to the possibility that some apparently natural catastrophes are in fact caused by humans. Again, however, this is distinct from human caused climate change.